On the off chance that you follow school football, you’ve presumably stumbled into Ohio State once or twice. Their football program is extremely old and exceptionally esteemed.
Yet, I’m actually recoiling at the possibility of watching them get beaten by Oregon at the Rose Bowl. (Indeed I’m genuinely sure they’ll lose despite the fact that I do trust I’m off-base.) As a Big Ten fan, I’m truly burnt out on watching Ohio State get pounded in these huge, public games.
(Obviously, if MY group, the Wisconsin Badgers, could at any point really beat them in meeting, possibly the entirety of this would be unique yet I diverge.)
For the existence of me I was unable to sort out what was happening. For what reason did Ohio State win so darn many games just to reliably humiliate the Big Ten in enormous out-of-gathering games? Jim Tressel is a great mentor. Right?
Indeed, this year I at last found my solution. Indeed Jim Tressel is a great mentor. However, he plays not to lose. He doesn’t play to win.
Also, that, my companions, is the reason he loses the defining moments. Since those groups come to win. Also, Tressel is coming not to lose. (Also, that is the reason he’s likely gong to lose to Oregon at the Rose Bowl since Oregon has been playing to win the entire season.) ยูฟ่าเบท ดอทคอม
So how might it work out in reality to play not to lose? Well it implies playing moderately. You punt the ball as opposed to making it work on fourth and short. You go for the field objective as opposed to the score. You assemble extremely amazing guards. You submit not many punishments. You have a very much instructed group.
It additionally implies you don’t take risks. You don’t have quarterbacks that hurl the ball down the field in broken plays that can bring about a block attempt or a 80-yard score. You additionally don’t win a great deal of shootouts. Also, if your approach isn’t working, you have relatively little alternatives in light of the fact that blindly going for it isn’t a normal thing for you.
Furthermore, you’re likewise beautiful tedious to watch. (Sorry Buckeye fans yet it’s valid.)
Presently, would you be able to dominate matches playing not to lose? Totally. Tressel has an entirely decent record. (Far superior to my Badgers.) He’s won the Big Ten Title practically consistently.
The issue happens when he gets to the defining moments. Presently I’m not a mentor nor did I at any point play football yet I do watch a ton of it and this is what I think occurs. In case you’re not ready to keep Ohio from executing their approach, you’re toast. On the off chance that Ohio can execute their approach, they will do it well indeed and likely beat you.
However, on the off chance that you mess up that course of action, assuming you perplex them, well Ohio has an issue. They’re bad at ad libbing nor do they take risks. Also, on the off chance that you don’t take a risk, particularly at the most critical moment, you’re presumably not going to dominate those matches.
So what might be said about you? It is safe to say that you are playing not to lose or would you say you are playing to win? Sure you can do well playing not to lose, yet you’re never going to play as large of a game as you could be. Play to win, sure you may fall all over every once in a while yet you’ll most likely wind up playing greater than you at any point expected.